| MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT | | | | Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 70 % |
| THROUGH VERMICULTURE | | | | Unscientific disposal of MSW in India cities (Pachuri |
| | | | & Sridharan, 1998) ………… Most |
| PPBSA, Ranipatna, Balasore (Orissa) 756001 | | | | Changes of out break of epidemics owing to |
| India E-mail ID  | | | | faulty management of MSW…………Very |
| Key words: MSW, waste disposal, biodegradable, | | | | Most |
| waste segregation, CPCB, SPCB, epidemic | | | | Examples of disastrous consequences of |
| outbreak, better environment, vermi technology, | | | | unscientific MSW management |
| epigeic worms, worm cast, vermi compost, | | | | Â Â Â Â Â I )Â Surat (1994 )Â |
|  Municipal Solid Wastes: | | | | ……………………………..Plague |
| According to NEERI, Municipal Solid Waste | | | | epidemic |
| generation in India is roughly about 200grams in | | | | Â Â Â Â Â II ) Delhi ( recent ) |
| small towns and 900grams in large towns. | | | | ………………………...…Dengue |
| The rate of solid waste generation has out paced | | | | epidemic                    |
| the rate of population growth. For example in the | | | | Lacunae and Loop holes |
| city of Mumbai, | | | | 1. Policy gaps:-Â Â Â Roles and responsibilities of |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â year | | | | CPCB and SPCBs not clearly defined, Lack of |
| 1981Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â year | | | | clear directives on technology implementations, |
| 1991Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â growth | | | | Lack of organized repacking sector Unwillingness |
| 1. v    Population :                 | | | | by the local bodies( Municipalities and NACs) to |
|   8.2 millions               12.3 | | | | impose taxes for bettering the environment. |
| millions           49%v    Solid | | | |  2. Knowledge, Information & Data gaps- |
| Waste :Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3,200 | | | | Want of a National inventory, Lack of Scientific |
| tones                  5,355 | | | | approach in MSW management, Non identification |
| tones            67% | | | | least cost effective MSW management technique, |
| Municipal solid waste generation in this country as | | | | No Practice of segregation of waste components |
| estimated by 2 different central agencies are as | | | | into recyclables and non recyclables, |
| under | | | | No waste to energy projects, No attempt to build |
| 1. i. EPTRI (1995) for 23 major Indian | | | | awareness on MSW management – Collection |
| cities     -    11 million tones | | | | and disposal. |
| 2. ii. CPCBÂ Â (1997) for the same number of | | | | Recommendations |
| cities -Â 18 million tones | | | | 1. Enforcement of uniform scientifically proven |
| Types    of    M S W  - | | | | technique in MSW collection – segregation- |
|  It is to note that 13% to 20% of all | | | | disposal-re use under the supervision of |
| wastes generated are recyclable | | | | environment monitoring agencies. |
| Biodegradables                    | | | | 2. The entire system of MSW management- |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | collection, transportation, segregation, treatment, |
|                     Non | | | | disposal and re use must be made – more |
| biodegradables | | | | mechanised and less manual. |
| 1. Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | 3. Recyclables must suitably be segregated and |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | managed to yield revenue. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Building & | | | | 4. There should be proper co-ordination and |
| construction materials | | | | co-operation between the environment monitoring |
| Waste green/dry leaves + plant | | | | agencies, local government bodies (municipalities, |
| parts                     Coal | | | | NACs) and the waste recycling unit(s). |
| briquettes | | | | 5. Waste to energy projects must be |
| 1. Animal dung. Â Â | | | | implemented on priority basis. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | 6. Biodegradable solid wastes must be converted |
| Â Plastics & polythenes | | | | to high quality vermi compost for organic farming, |
| Human faeces (fresh | | | | safe food production and revenue collection. |
| decomposed).           | | | | 7. Roles of CPCB and SPCBs must be clearly |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Glass wanes | | | | defined and they must be made accountable for |
| 1. Metals | | | | out break of epidemics and other health oriented |
| 2. Ashes. | | | | problems. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Biomedical wastes | | | | 1. Â Â Â Â Â 8. Â Â Adequate awareness building on |
| Hotel and canteen refuses. | | | | MSW disposal and management must be made |
| Daily vegetable market refuses. | | | | compulsory. |
| House hold refuses. | | | | 2. Â Â Â Â Â 9. Â Â Local government bodies like the |
| Dead animal bodies. | | | | corporations, municipalities and NACs must be |
| Physico-Chemical Characteristics of MSW in India | | | | made |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â % of wet | | | | Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â accountable for providing the |
| weight in tones | | | | citizen with healthy environment. |
| Sl.No   Components               | | | |     10. Citizen must be empowered to |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â 1971-1973Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1995 | | | | demand better environment and better living. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (40 | | | | MSW management to yield quality vermi compost |
| Cities)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (23 Cities) | | | | Â 1. Heap method of decomposition on open yard |
| 1. Paper                          | | | | of biodegradable MSW –with the principle, |
|        4.14                    | | | | greater  |
| Â Â Â 5.78 | | | | 1. Â Â Â Â the height quicker is the process of |
| 2. Plastics                   | | | | decomposition. Separation of nondgradables should |
| 0.69                       3.90 | | | | be   |
| 3. Metals                         | | | |     ensured before the decomposition process |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.50Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | is initiated. Decomposing bacteria may used to |
|    1.90 | | | | quicken |
| 4. | | | | Â Â Â Â the process. |
| Glass                           | | | | 2.  Windrow method of vermiculture in shade; |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.40Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | less the height better vermi composting. |
|    2.10 | | | | 3. Worm inoculation and moisture maintenance is |
| 5. Rags    | | | | to be made manually, efficiently and effectively |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | 4. Â Worm inoculation @ 2Kg of diverse epigeic |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.83Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | worms like, Eisenia foetida (60%), Eudrilus eugenie |
| Â Â Â 3.50 | | | | Â Â |
| 6. Ashes etc.                   | | | |     (30%) and Perionyx excavatus (10%) for |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 49.20Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | every quintal of decomposed MSW laid in wind |
| Â Â Â 40.30 | | | | rows. |
| 7. Total compostible | | | | 5. Harvesting and packeting of worm cast laden |
| matter41.24Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 41.80 | | | | vermi compost should be made after physical |
| 8. Calorific value(K.Cal/Kg)Â 800-1100Â Â Â | | | | Â Â Â Â examination of abundance of granular |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â < 1500 | | | | materials (at least 75-80%) in the compost (about |
| 9. Carbon-Nitrogen ratio       | | | | 3 months     |
| 20-30                    25-40 | | | |     after laying or  when actually ready for |
| Source: a. Bhide & Sudaresan (1983); b.EPTRI | | | | harvesting). Well formed vermi compost is good |
| (1995) | | | | for crops. |
| State of Facts | | | | Note: The above process of MSW management |
| According to NIUA (1989) MSW Collection | | | | can be adopted in all tropical countries world wide. |
| efficiency for average Indian Cities…….72 % | | | | Quality vermi compost enhances soil fertility |
| Inadequacy of infrastructure for MSW | | | | substantially and can replace chemical fertilizers. |