Criticisms of Recycling

Humanity has advanced so much in terms ofpollutants themselves. For example, filtering
technology, society, and culture. It is necessary;chemicals used for recycling paper are actually
we need to advance as we live in a world thattoxic. Ironic considering that recycling is supposed
has become more complex by the day.to save the environment. Indeed, critics say that
Unfortunately, we are abusing nature for thisrecycling won't matter since pollutants and waste
advancement. Our factories have emittedsleaze their way into the recycling industry.
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The need2) There isn't any garbage problem; therefore,
for timber and dwelling places resulted in thethere is no need to recycle. Critics say that the
denudation of our forests. Our marine travelgarbage crisis is false propaganda. That's because
polluted seas. Our landfills contaminatedthere are lots of areas that can be used as
groundwater. That is why we now have strongerlandfills. Also, landfills are easily treated and
hurricanes, more massive landslides, warmercovered, and are cost effective ways to store
climates, and escalated extinction; these are thegarbage. The garbage problem, they say, is an
consequences of damaging our world and theoverreaction.
fragile ecosystems.3) Recycling gives us a false sense of security.
Astronomer Carl Sagan said in as commencementAkin to the first reason, recycling causes harmful
exercise in 1996 regarding a photograph titled Theenvironmental impact. However, the false
Pale Blue Dot (referring to the earth as seen bypropaganda and massive information campaign
Voyager 1 6.4 billion miles away), we have "tomakes people think that no harm is done when
preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the onlyrecycling. In effect, people will tend to buy more
home we've ever known." How true. And one ofenvironmentally harmful products (such as plastic
the easiest ways to save our world is throughbottles or diapers), believing that they can be
recycling. Recycling is the reprocessing of old,recycled anyway. This kind of thinking is called
used, and ready-to-throw materials into newentitled consumerism.
products. In the past few decades, recycling has4. Recycling actually hurts the economy. That's
gained a lot of support. That's because peoplebecause recycling equipment, chemicals, and
have realized the benefits recycling contribute toprocesses are actually expensive. In fact,
nature. Furthermore, the effective promotion andrecycling, in some cases, is more costly than
awareness programs with regards to recyclingproducing virgin products. Thus, the endeavor
have garnered even more support.becomes an economic liability. Furthermore,
However, not all people are convinced thatrecycling certain products is difficult and not
recycling is the way to get rid of the world'salways successful.
garbage. Here's why:5. A steady supply of recyclable materials and a
1) Recycling instigates environmental problemsstrong demand for recycled goods are needed
rather than reducing it. That's because thefor the endeavor to be fully viable. Government
processes and materials used for recycling areintervention is needed here.